Showing posts with label Superintendent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Superintendent. Show all posts
Monday, December 5, 2016
Indiana Superintendents Speak Up Against Broken ISTEP+ ... And We Couldn't Agree More
Labels:
accountability,
grade,
ISTEP+,
Superintendent
Friday, July 3, 2015
Can You Say Nepotism?
Let us start with a simple definition of the term.
nep·o·tism / ˈnepəˌtizəm/
noun
the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.
synonyms:favoritism, preferential treatment, the old boy network, looking after one's own, bias, partiality, partisanship
"hiring my daughter was not nepotism—it was just good business"
Now, lets look at Indiana's "nepotism law" effective July 1 2012.
Ind. Code § 4-15-7-1 : Indiana Code - Section 4-15-7-1: Nepotism
(a) No person being related to any member of any state board or commission, or to the head of any state office or department or institution, as father, mother, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, a husband or wife, son or daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, niece or nephew, shall be eligible to any position in any such state board, commission, office, or department or institution, as the case may be, nor shall any such relative be entitled to receive any compensation for his or her services out of any appropriation provided by law.
(b) This section shall not apply if such person has been employed in the same position in such office or department or institution for at least twelve (12) consecutive months immediately preceding the appointment of his relative as a board member or head of such office, department, or institution.
(c) This section does not apply to the authority of the board of trustees of a state educational institution to employ any person the board considers necessary under IC 21-38-3-1.
(d) No persons related as father, mother, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, husband, wife, son, daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, niece, or nephew may be placed in a direct supervisory-subordinate relationship.
(Formerly: Acts 1941, c.16, s.1; Acts 1961, c.8, s.1.) As amended by Acts 1982, P.L.23, SEC.35; P.L.36-1995, SEC.1; P.L.2-2007, SEC.44; P.L.3-2008, SEC.8.
With this background information, let's take a look at the reappointment of Sarah O'Brien to the Indiana State Board of Education and her recent election as the board's Vice-Chair. How does this appointment and Vice-Chair position relate to a possible violation of this "nepotism" law, along with a variety of potential ethics violations? Mrs. O'Brien isn't just a 4th grade teacher from Avon who, as a Republican, was appointed to the SBOE and recently reappointed after legislative changes to the boards structure, she is also the daughter of Republican State Representative Bill Fine of Munster. This is where the possible violation occurs. Representative Fine is a Republican member of the House Education Committee who pushed the passage of legislation that changed the structure of the SBOE and co-authored key language that created the Vice-Chair position to share powers with the Elected Superintendent of Public Instruction, Glenda Ritz.
With the passage of this legislation, Governor Pence re-appointed O'Brien to the Board and set up her opportunity to be elected as Vice-Chair. This selection was rumored before the SBOE met for their restructuring meeting. The "election" of O'Brien appears to have been a done deal as part of Pence's plan when he made his recent appointments and refused to reappoint certain members who might have been more viable possibilities to be named Vice-Chair.
This may not be a clear violation of Indiana Law, but it appears to set up potential questions regarding "nepotism", board appointments, committee selections, and legislative ethics.
Indiana voters need to be vigilant in monitoring recent SBOE actions, the Governor's continued education agenda, and the co-mingling of legislators and appointed board members. Raise questions, raise your voices, and demand transparency in all aspects of government activity. Most importantly, voters in Indiana need to get to the polls and vote to save our PUBLIC schools from the continued destruction and privatization planned by Pence and his wealthy corporate "reform" supporters.
Labels:
advocacy,
Bill Fine,
Bob Behning,
Department of Education,
Glenda Ritz,
Governor,
Indiana House,
Indiana SBOE,
Indiana Senate,
ISBOE,
Mike Pence,
Philip D. Arnold,
Reform,
Sarah O'Brien,
SB 1,
Superintendent,
Teacher
Friday, February 1, 2013
Legislative Lunchbox
"Do legislators deserve the same apples teachers get for their efforts in education? Every Friday, "Hoosier Mom on Politics" makes that decision, giving two legislators a good or bad apple, depending on their support of Public Education and Indiana’s children. Check back every Friday at lunchtime to see what the Hoosier Mom packs in the Legislator Lunchbox for the week!
For this post of the “Legislative Lunchbox”, I chose to pack a lunch for Senator Ed Charbonneau (R-Valparaiso) and for State Representative Todd Huston (R-Fishers).
Senator Ed Charbonneau received a good apple in his lunchbox for authoring SB 416 which "voids the administrative rule that establishes the A to F designations of school performance". The bill then establishes criteria for the State Board of Education to follow when establishing designations of schools. The bill also requires the State Board of Education to give a report to the General Assembly on the school designation criteria. Sen. Charbonneau, the Hoosier Mom has found the A to F system of accountability to be completely ridiculous; it doesn't even measure my kid's academic progress through school! The designations are completely non-sensical, with some schools obtaining a higher ranking one year, a low ranking the following year. The grading system currently measures student growth of a group of children (say - third graders) against their peers the next year. That means the third grade class in 2010 is compared to the 3rd grade class in 2011, instead of using standardized criteria to compare student growth of a third grader as a measure of academic achievement. This bill sounds great on the surface, but the fact is this bill hasn't even had a hearing yet in committee. Senator Charbonneau and everyone who reads this blog, we need to figure out how to at least get this bill heard in committee. I am going to send an email to every member of the Senate Committe on Education and ask this bill get a hearing next week.
Representative Todd Huston received a bad apple in his lunchbox for introducing HB 1357 which removes the requirement for a School Superintendent to hold a teacher's license or a superintendent's license. It also allows School Board to require Superintendent's to live within the school district while repealing the requirement that a County Superintendent of schools have at least 5 successful years of teaching experience. Rep. Huston, your "No Experience Necessary" attitude when it comes to the education of the children of Indiana , just doesn't make common sense. All this bill will accomplish is the continued deprofessionalization of the teaching profession. No need to have learned through education and experience, how to administrate and lead a school. What happened to respecting the minimum standards of excellence that a profession beleives necessary to maintain the quality of the profession? So many State Superintendents, Principals, Teachers, and Parents - like the Hoosier Mom, believe this bill needs to go the way of the do-do bird. Yet, the fact remains - this bill actually was heard and made it out of committee. When this bill is read and discussed in the House, you can bet that the parents and educators around this State will show up and let you know how bad an idea this is for public education.
The Hoosier Mom hopes all the readers will spread the word about the Legislative Lunchbox. Feel free to email me with suggestions for next week’s lunch: for whom should I pack lunch and why?
For this post of the “Legislative Lunchbox”, I chose to pack a lunch for Senator Ed Charbonneau (R-Valparaiso) and for State Representative Todd Huston (R-Fishers).
Senator Ed Charbonneau received a good apple in his lunchbox for authoring SB 416 which "voids the administrative rule that establishes the A to F designations of school performance". The bill then establishes criteria for the State Board of Education to follow when establishing designations of schools. The bill also requires the State Board of Education to give a report to the General Assembly on the school designation criteria. Sen. Charbonneau, the Hoosier Mom has found the A to F system of accountability to be completely ridiculous; it doesn't even measure my kid's academic progress through school! The designations are completely non-sensical, with some schools obtaining a higher ranking one year, a low ranking the following year. The grading system currently measures student growth of a group of children (say - third graders) against their peers the next year. That means the third grade class in 2010 is compared to the 3rd grade class in 2011, instead of using standardized criteria to compare student growth of a third grader as a measure of academic achievement. This bill sounds great on the surface, but the fact is this bill hasn't even had a hearing yet in committee. Senator Charbonneau and everyone who reads this blog, we need to figure out how to at least get this bill heard in committee. I am going to send an email to every member of the Senate Committe on Education and ask this bill get a hearing next week.
Representative Todd Huston received a bad apple in his lunchbox for introducing HB 1357 which removes the requirement for a School Superintendent to hold a teacher's license or a superintendent's license. It also allows School Board to require Superintendent's to live within the school district while repealing the requirement that a County Superintendent of schools have at least 5 successful years of teaching experience. Rep. Huston, your "No Experience Necessary" attitude when it comes to the education of the children of Indiana , just doesn't make common sense. All this bill will accomplish is the continued deprofessionalization of the teaching profession. No need to have learned through education and experience, how to administrate and lead a school. What happened to respecting the minimum standards of excellence that a profession beleives necessary to maintain the quality of the profession? So many State Superintendents, Principals, Teachers, and Parents - like the Hoosier Mom, believe this bill needs to go the way of the do-do bird. Yet, the fact remains - this bill actually was heard and made it out of committee. When this bill is read and discussed in the House, you can bet that the parents and educators around this State will show up and let you know how bad an idea this is for public education.
The Hoosier Mom hopes all the readers will spread the word about the Legislative Lunchbox. Feel free to email me with suggestions for next week’s lunch: for whom should I pack lunch and why?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





